▲Reach out

let's.talk

I'm a slow correspondent. A couple of notes below on what tends to land well, and what tends not to.

Channels

LinkedIn /in/khan-maria- DMs are open. A sentence of context goes a long way.
GitHub @missusk Issues and PRs reach me faster than email.
Email maria@runbookpages.com Subject lines that explain themselves get answered first.

Inbox router — click a tag, see what happens to it.

$ route --inbox
hover or click a tag above to see the verdict

Lands well

Technical questions on the topics I write about: Rails, Kubernetes, dynamic config, distributed coordination.
Collaboration on platform / infra work, especially the messy migration-shaped kind.
Specific design questions where you can name the failure mode you are worried about. Those are the fun threads.
Pointers to a paper, an RFC, or a Postgres detail I've gotten wrong. Genuinely my favorite kind of email.
Recruiters with a real role in mind that you actually think fits. Happy to chat. Lead with the role and the team, not the boilerplate.

Tends not to

"Quick chats" without a question attached. I am bad at unstructured conversations and would rather we both have a thread to pull on.
Asks to amplify a launch or campaign on LinkedIn. Not really my lane and I would not be useful at it.
LeetCode or DSA guidance and help. I write about systems, not interview prep, and you will get better signal from people who do.
SEO or growth-marketing advice for the site. I am not optimizing it for any of that and would not be useful at it.
Connect requests with no sentence of context. I am not sure how to engage with them and they tend to sit unread.

Replies come on a slow weekly cadence rather than instant. If something is time-sensitive, mark it that way and it will jump the queue.